PERSPECTA

News from every angle

Results for "American Public"

79 stories found

Worldbloomberg1mo ago

US Inconsistent Messaging on Iran Confuses Region

Michael Allen, a former national security aide, stated that the US's inability to maintain a coherent message on Iran has caused confusion among the American public and in the Middle East region.

Bill Gates Questioned by US Congress Over Jeffrey Epstein Ties
PoliticsBBCNYTThe Guardian+25NPRFox Newscbccnbcorfvgdigi24The Independent+17 more2mo ago28 sources

Bill Gates Questioned by US Congress Over Jeffrey Epstein Ties

Bill Gates appeared before a closed-door panel on Capitol Hill to be questioned by US Congress investigators regarding his connections to Jeffrey Epstein. This testimony follows public scrutiny and polls indicating disapproval of the Trump administration's handling of Epstein cases.

US Primaries Offer Gauge of American Mood
PoliticsFT3mo ago

US Primaries Offer Gauge of American Mood

Primary elections across various US states, from California to Iowa, are taking place, providing an indication of the American public's sentiment regarding political figures and movements.

Israel's Popularity Declines in US Amid Iran Conflict
Worldnzz4mo ago

Israel's Popularity Declines in US Amid Iran Conflict

Despite close cooperation between Israel and the US in the war against Iran, Israel is losing support among the American public, particularly Democrats. This decline in popularity poses a threat to US backing for Israel.

Trump Administration Uses Memes to Frame Iran War
Politicsdigi245mo ago

Trump Administration Uses Memes to Frame Iran War

Donald Trump and White House officials are reportedly attempting to present the war in Iran as a 'game' to a skeptical American public, utilizing various memes, including SpongeBob SquarePants, as part of their communication strategy.

POLITICS: THE RHETORIC OF WAR
PoliticsDawn5mo ago

POLITICS: THE RHETORIC OF WAR

When US Secretary of Defence James Mattis addressed the intensification of US combat operations against the Islamic State group in 2017, he assured the American public of his commitment to “get the strategy right” while maintaining “the rules of engagement” to “protect the innocent.” Mattis’ professional tone was a stark contrast to [current US] Secretary Pete Hegseth’s remarks following the first days of the joint US-Israeli combat operations in Iran. On March 2, 2026, after bragging about t...

When Both Sides Go Quiet
PoliticsFox NewsYahoozerohedge+1Tehran Times6mo ago4 sources

When Both Sides Go Quiet

When Both Sides Go Quiet Submitted by QTR's Fringe Finance There is a political instinct that I’ve developed over the last few decade or so: when both parties are shouting, it’s business as usual. When both parties go quiet, pay attention, because something ugly is probably getting passed or covered up, and the American taxpayer is likely footing the bill of consequences. Few public controversies in recent memory have generated as much bipartisan distrust as the handling of the Epstein files. Republicans accused Democrats of failing to pursue full transparency while President Biden was in office. Now Democrats accuse Republicans of withholding or slow-walking the release of the complete records. The blame shifts with political control, but the underlying fact pattern remains the same: both parties have figures of influence whose names have surfaced in connection with Epstein’s orbit. That reality complicates the politics of accountability and fuels public suspicion that neither side is entirely comfortable with full disclosure. What should have been a straightforward matter of transparency, identifying networks of power, influence, and possible criminal complicity, has instead unfolded as a slow humiliating drip of redactions, procedural delays, partial disclosures and cagey congressional testimony. Each release seems to raise more questions than it resolves. These questions revolve around sex trafficking, exploitation, abuse of minors, coercion and manipulation, elite complicity, obstruction of justice, etc. But the deeper damage taking place now is not only about the crimes associated with Jeffrey Epstein. It is about institutional response. If only one political party had meaningful exposure to the scandal, the other would likely have been far more relentless in demanding transparency. But this is different. Despite Democrats harping on the files now, they were quiet in the years prior to Trump’s second term and, because Epstein’s connections span media, finance, academia, and politics, the discomfort still appears bipartisan. And that is precisely what unsettles me. When both political parties fail to press aggressively on something meaningful, especially something morally explosive, it often suggests that the issue cuts deeper than surface narratives allow. Bipartisan hesitation can signal overlapping vulnerability. Silence across the aisle is rarely accidental. The horror here is not just what may have occurred in private circles of power, but the perception that the institutions tasked with accountability are reluctant to fully illuminate it. Justice delayed in cases involving elites feels less like procedural caution and more like reputational risk management. Whether or not that perception is entirely fair, it is corrosive. Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs’ chief legal officer Kathryn Ruemmler announced her resignation after new emails with Epstein came to light, prompting internal pressure at the firm. British political figure Peter Mandelson resigned from the House of Lords and the Labour Party, and Scotland Yard has opened a criminal investigation into his ties with Epstein. In Norway, parliament has launched an external inquiry into prominent diplomats for their connections to Epstein, and police are investigating corruption allegations against former prime minister Thorbjørn Jagland and others. 🔥 50% OFF FOR LIFE: Using this coupon entitles you to 50% off an annual subscription to Fringe Finance for life: Get 50% off forever Across Europe, these disclosures have triggered formal probes, resignations, and institutional reviews that contrast sharply with the relative lack of accountability for high-profile figures in the United States, where calls for investigations and resignations have largely stalled. I mean, is Les Wexner really allowed to just walk around free at this point? How can that be possible? How are Kimbal Musk and Elon Musk allowed to remain on Tesla’s board? Why isn’t Bill Gates being hauled in front of congress? I have long argued that Americans should apply the same “when both parties agree, the American public is getting screwed” scrutiny to monetary policy for a similar reason. It is one of the few areas where both major political parties display remarkable convergence. While they wage visible battles over cultural issues and tax rates, they tend to align on central banking frameworks, large scale liquidity interventions, and deficit tolerance. Like other cover-ups, that alignment deserves examination. Monetary policy operates largely outside daily partisan warfare, yet it shapes purchasing power, asset prices, debt burdens, and wealth distribution. When balance sheets expand aggressively and markets are repeatedly stabilized during downturns, the effects are uneven. Asset holders often benefit first and most. Meanwhile, wage earners experience the lagging side effects such as inflationary pressure, higher living costs, and diminished purchasing power. Supporters of Modern Monetary Theory argue that sovereign currency systems provide more fiscal flexibility than traditionally assumed. Critics counter that, in practice, repeated interventions risk entrenching a cycle in which gains are privatized and losses are socialized. When markets rise, the wealth effect accrues to those with substantial exposure. When markets falter, public backstops prevent collapse. The middle class absorbs the inflationary residue. And the wealth gap widens: The structural similarity matters. When both parties avoid aggressive debate on a policy that materially burdens the average American, it raises the same instinctive question of what incentives are being protected. Monetary policy may not carry the visceral grotesqueness of the Epstein scandal, but it carries long term economic consequences that most Americans don’t know they are bearing, and don’t understand that they are being lied to about. The comparison is not moral equivalence. It is structural parallel. In one case, alleged networks of power may be shielded by mutual hesitation. In the other, a financial architecture persists with limited democratic scrutiny because challenging it would destabilize shared political comfort. In both cases, bipartisan alignment dampens confrontation. Two forms of silence. Two different domains. Both revealing. Foreign policy, particularly the authorization and funding of wars, has often followed a similar pattern. While domestic issues produce loud partisan divides, military interventions abroad frequently pass with overwhelming support from leadership in both parties. Public debate may flare at the margins, but institutional consensus tends to solidify quickly once action begins. History shows that major military engagements, from post 9/11 authorizations to prolonged overseas conflicts, have often been backed by broad congressional majorities. The initial votes are decisive. The funding continues year after year. Only later, when costs mount and public opinion shifts, does meaningful dissent emerge. By then, strategic commitments and financial obligations are deeply entrenched. Again, the pattern is not about moral equivalence between policy domains. It is about incentives. When both political parties converge quickly on matters involving immense money, immense power, or immense liability, scrutiny tends to narrow rather than widen. And when scrutiny narrows at the highest levels, the public’s role shifts from participant to spectator. When both political parties fail to address something meaningful, when they close ranks instead of competing for exposure, the public should not assume the issue is trivial. More often, it suggests the truth behind the surface may be larger and more consequential than advertised. Democracies depend not just on disagreement, but on adversarial pressure. When that pressure disappears, citizens are right to lean in, not tune out. When both sides go quiet, the story is rarely over. As the Epstein files are showing, it may simply run far deeper than we are being shown. Now read: Today's Epstein’s Records Destroy Official Narratives Our Liquidity Addiction Continues Do DOJ Docs Show Epstein Death Notice A Day Early? The Hijacking Of Bitcoin: Epstein’s Hidden Network Why America’s Two-Party System Will Never Threaten the True Political Elites QTR’s Disclaimer: Please read my full legal disclaimer on my About page here. This post represents my opinions only. In addition, please understand I am an idiot and often get things wrong and lose money. I may own or transact in any names mentioned in this piece at any time without warning. Contributor posts and aggregated posts have been hand selected by me, have not been fact checked and are the opinions of their authors. They are either submitted to QTR by their author, reprinted under a Creative Commons license with my best effort to uphold what the license asks, or with the permission of the author. This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any stocks or securities, just my opinions. I often lose money on positions I trade/invest in. I may add any name mentioned in this article and sell any name mentioned in this piece at any time, without further warning. None of this is a solicitation to buy or sell securities. I may or may not own names I write about and are watching. Sometimes I’m bullish without owning things, sometimes I’m bearish and do own things. Just assume my positions could be exactly the opposite of what you think they are just in case. If I’m long I could quickly be short and vice versa. I won’t update my positions. All positions can change immediately as soon as I publish this, with or without notice and at any point I can be long, short or neutral on any position. You are on your own. Do not make decisions based on my blog. I exist on the fringe. If you see numbers and calculations of any sort, assume they are wrong and double check them. I failed Algebra in 8th grade and topped off my high school math accolades by getting a D- in remedial Calculus my senior year, before becoming an English major in college so I could bullshit my way through things easier. I am an investor in Mark’s fund. The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. These are not the opinions of any of my employers, partners, or associates. I did my best to be honest about my disclosures but can’t guarantee I am right; I write these posts after a couple beers sometimes. I edit after my posts are published because I’m impatient and lazy, so if you see a typo, check back in a half hour. Also, I just straight up get shit wrong a lot. I mention it twice because it’s that important. Tyler Durden Tue, 02/17/2026 - 14:00

Fauci Accused of Hiding COVID-19 Truths from Public
PoliticsFox News23d ago

Fauci Accused of Hiding COVID-19 Truths from Public

A newly released email reportedly shows Anthony Fauci was aware of asymptomatic COVID-19 transmission months before he cited it as a reason to change mask guidance, leading to accusations that he hid the truth from the American public.

MK Sharren Haskel Summoned in Comptroller Election Scandal
Politicsjerusalem-postn1-bihexpress-tribune1mo ago3 sources

MK Sharren Haskel Summoned in Comptroller Election Scandal

Israeli Knesset member Sharren Haskel was summoned by Lahav 433 in connection with an election scandal involving the State Comptroller. This development occurs as Prime Minister Netanyahu acknowledged a decline in his popularity among the American public.

JD Vance Accuses Israeli Government Faction of Manipulating US Opinion on Iran Deal
PoliticsBBCAl Jazeeraaftonbladet+12svenska-dagbladetpublicoindex-hrobservadorhotnewscyprus-mailklix-ban1-bih+4 more1mo ago15 sources

JD Vance Accuses Israeli Government Faction of Manipulating US Opinion on Iran Deal

Senator JD Vance has accused a faction within the Israeli government of attempting to manipulate American public opinion to oppose a deal with Iran and prolong conflict. Vance stated that this group sought to influence US citizens against diplomacy with Iran.

Iran Ceasefire Deal and Limits of American Power Discussed
WorldAl JazeeraDaily Star BDTehran Times2mo ago3 sources

Iran Ceasefire Deal and Limits of American Power Discussed

Discussions are ongoing regarding the Iran ceasefire deal, acknowledging its imperfections while highlighting its alignment with American public sentiment. The agreement also sheds light on the limitations of American power in the region, with various outlets covering related aspects of Iran, US, and ceasefire.

Gallup Poll Shows Decline in US Support for LGBTQ+ Issues
PoliticsThe GuardianFox NewsThe Independent+2national-postYahoo3mo ago5 sources

Gallup Poll Shows Decline in US Support for LGBTQ+ Issues

A new Gallup poll indicates a downtick in American public support for same-sex marriage and transgender acceptance, suggesting a potential stalling or reversal of previously rising trends in LGBTQ+ issues.

Trump Threatens 25% Tariffs on EU Cars; Brussels Responds
PoliticsAPReutersBBC+88bloombergNYTFTle-mondeThe GuardianNPRAl JazeeraCNN+80 more4mo ago91 sources

Trump Threatens 25% Tariffs on EU Cars; Brussels Responds

President Trump announced plans to impose 25% tariffs on cars and trucks imported from the European Union, citing dissatisfaction with trade relations. The European Union quickly responded, urging the US to honor existing agreements and warning of potential countermeasures.

Worldseneweb5mo ago

US-Israel Alliance in Iran Conflict Faces Scrutiny Amid Diverging Tactics

Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu's joint aggression against Iran has faced criticism and negative reactions, leading to questions about whether the US and Israel are still aligned in their approach, with reports highlighting diverging tactics between the two nations and a shift in American public opinion regarding the Middle East.

Americans' Views on US Intervention in Foreign Conflicts
Politicsndtv2mo ago

Americans' Views on US Intervention in Foreign Conflicts

A report explores American public opinion regarding US intervention in conflicts abroad, noting that while many Iranians may be unhappy with their government, this does not necessarily translate to support for American or Israeli military strikes.

FinanceReuters4mo ago

KKR-backed GMR Considers $5 Billion US IPO

GMR, a company backed by KKR, is reportedly exploring a US initial public offering that could value it at $5 billion. The move would allow the company to tap into the American public market.

Pentagon Official Grilled Over $25 Billion Iran War Cost
WorldAPReutersBBC+47bloombergNYTFTThe GuardianNPRAl Jazeeradr-dkFox News+39 more4mo ago50 sources

Pentagon Official Grilled Over $25 Billion Iran War Cost

Pentagon officials, including Pete Hegseth, faced intense congressional scrutiny during a hearing regarding the estimated $25 billion cost of the war in Iran. Lawmakers questioned the figures and the administration's handling of the conflict.

Trump Announces Three-Week Extension of Israel-Lebanon Truce
PoliticsAPReutersBBC+85bloombergNYTeconomistwsjFTle-mondewapoThe Guardian+77 more4mo ago88 sources

Trump Announces Three-Week Extension of Israel-Lebanon Truce

US President Donald Trump announced that the ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon has been extended for an additional three weeks. Trump also stated that Israel retains the right to launch attacks, emphasizing they would be careful.

Macron Rejects Trump's 'Unrealistic' Hormuz Military Action Amid European Criticism
WorldAPReutersBBC+69bloombergNYTwsjle-mondewapoThe GuardianNPRAl Jazeera+61 more5mo ago72 sources

Macron Rejects Trump's 'Unrealistic' Hormuz Military Action Amid European Criticism

French President Emmanuel Macron has sharply criticized Donald Trump, calling his statements 'unserious' and rejecting a military operation to open the Strait of Hormuz as 'unrealistic'. This comes as Trump's rhetoric on the Iran conflict continues to draw criticism and raise concerns among European allies.

Iran rejects ‘big lies’ after Trump lays out case for possible attack
PoliticsSCMPdnevnik-bgRappler6mo ago3 sources

Iran rejects ‘big lies’ after Trump lays out case for possible attack

US President Donald Trump briefly laid out ⁠his case for a possible attack on Iran in his State of the Union speech to Congress on Tuesday, saying he would not allow the world’s biggest sponsor of terrorism to have a nuclear weapon. Even while assembling a massive military force in the Middle East, Trump has done little to explain to the American public why he might be leading the US into its most aggressive action against the Islamic Republic since its 1979 revolution. In his speech, Trump...

Obama Says Aliens Exist But Are Not Kept In Area 51
Politicszerohedge6mo ago

Obama Says Aliens Exist But Are Not Kept In Area 51

Obama Says Aliens Exist But Are Not Kept In Area 51 Authored by Rachel Roberts via The Epoch Times, Former U.S. President Barack Obama said in a Feb. 14 podcast interview that aliens are real but that none are kept at the secretive Area 51 military base in the Nevada desert, later adding that he didn’t see any evidence indicating that extraterrestrials have contacted Earth during his presidency. In the interview, when asked, “Are aliens real?” Obama replied, “They’re real, but I haven’t seen them—and they’re not being kept in [Area 51]. There’s no underground facility, unless there’s this enormous conspiracy and they hid it from the president of the United States.” Obama became the first leader of the United States to affirm the existence of extraterrestrial life when questioned by progressive podcaster Brian Tyler Cohen in a video posted on YouTube. After the interview went viral, Obama said on Instagram that he wanted to “clarify” his comments to Cohen, writing that he was “trying to stick with the spirit of the speed round” while speaking on the podcast. “Statistically, the universe is so vast that the odds are good there’s life out there,” he wrote. “But the distances between solar systems are so great that the chances we’ve been visited by aliens is low, and I saw no evidence during my presidency that extraterrestrials have made contact with us. Really!” In 2013, Obama was possibly the first U.S. leader to acknowledge the existence of Area 51, an Air Force base built during the Cold War, which has long been rumored to house extraterrestrials and unidentified flying objects (UFOs). Cohen did not ask Obama a follow-up question on the issue. Instead, he asked the former president what his first question had been upon entering the White House. “Where are the aliens?” Obama joked in response. Some critics, including British political commentator Calvin Robinson, said Cohen should have asked Obama for more information about aliens. “When a former President of the United States says on the record there are aliens, YOU FOLLOW UP WITH RELEVANT QUESTIONS. You do not continue reading from your script,” he wrote on X. The U.S. government first acknowledged Area 51’s existence in 2013 through a Freedom of Information request and has declassified documents detailing its history and purpose. The base has been a testing ground for a host of top-secret aircraft, including the U-2 in the 1950s and later the F-117 stealth fighter. Trump Admin on Aliens President Donald Trump has expressed skepticism about the existence of aliens, while acknowledging that “anything is possible.” Trump addressed the subject in several media appearances during the 2024 presidential campaign. On a podcast with Lex Fridman, Trump said he would consider pushing the Pentagon to release additional UFO footage that many believe is classified. “Oh yeah, sure, I’ll do that. I would do that. I’d love to do that,” Trump said, noting that public pressure to disclose records relating to UFOs is similar to that surrounding the John F. Kennedy assassination. On Logan Paul’s “Impaulsive” podcast in June 2025, Trump said, “Am I a believer? No, I can’t say I am." “But I have met with people, serious people, that say there’s some really strange things flying around out there.” Trump added that given the size of the universe, “Why wouldn’t there be something, somebody?” Vice President JD Vance has expressed his personal enthusiasm, telling the “Ruthless” podcast in August 2025 that he is “obsessed with the whole UFO thing.” “What’s actually going on? What were those videos all about? What’s actually happening?” Vance probed. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said last August that she believes aliens may exist and that the U.S. government holds classified information on the subject. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard in Washington on Dec. 2, 2025. Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/AFP via Getty Images Gabbard pledged to share disclosures from ongoing investigations into UFOs amid growing discussion of the phenomena at the highest levels of government. Pentagon Cases Unresolved The Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) continues to investigate more than 1,600 reports of “unidentified aerial phenomena,” an official term that has largely replaced “UFOs.” At a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing in November 2024, AARO’s director, Jon T. Kosloski, detailed cases the military believes it has solved—such as the widely circulated 2016 “GOFAST” video, now thought to show an object flying at 13,000 feet rather than right above the water—as well as other incidents which have so far defied explanation. Previous presidents, including Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter, have discussed their curiosity about alien life without confirming a belief in it. Carter reported that he saw an unidentified bright object in the sky when he was governor of Georgia in 1969, although he later said it was likely a natural phenomenon. A view of Area 51. Google Maps/Screenshot via The Epoch Times Clinton said that he was curious about the possibility of extraterrestrial life and that he had asked aides to look into both Area 51 and the Roswell incident of 1947, which gave rise to much speculation about a government cover-up. After Air Force personnel recovered metallic and rubber debris near Roswell, New Mexico, the U.S. Army Air Forces announced that they were in possession of a “flying disc” before retracting the statement within a day. Clinton said he was told there was no evidence of alien life in connection with the incident. In 1995, he joked about the Roswell incident, saying, “If the U.S. Air Force did recover any alien bodies, they didn’t tell me about it.” The American public is increasingly convinced that aliens exist and have visited Earth, according to recent polls. More than half (56 percent) of Americans believe extraterrestrials definitely or probably exist, according to a 2025 YouGov poll. Democrat (61 percent) and Independent (59 percent) voters are more likely than Republicans (46 percent) to believe aliens exist, with 73 percent of Americans believing the government would hide evidence of UFOs if it had any, and just 13 percent thinking it would be transparent, according to the same survey. Tyler Durden Tue, 02/17/2026 - 17:00