This story highlights the Indian government's increasing oversight and regulation of digital content platforms, reflecting ongoing debates about content moderation, censorship, and freedom of expression online. The use of legal provisions like Section 69A of the IT Act demonstrates the state's power to intervene in the digital space, impacting both content creators and consumers. It sets a precedent for how 'obscene' content is defined and controlled on streaming services.
AI-generated comparison of how 2 sources cover this story
Both news outlets report that the Centre has blocked five OTT platforms for streaming 'obscene' content, with coverage largely aligned on the core event. The Hindu provides the names of the blocked platforms, while Hindustan Times focuses on the legal provision used for the blocking. Overall, the reporting is factual and complementary rather than divergent.
Coverage matrix
hindu
hindustan-times
The specific names of the five blocked OTT platforms.
The legal provision, Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, that grants the Centre power to block online content.
Covered Divergent Not mentioned
What sources agree on
Five OTT platforms have been blocked by the Centre.
The blocking was initiated due to the streaming of 'obscene' content.
The action was taken by the government authorities.
Key claims1 agreed · 3 unverified
✓
The Government has blocked 5 OTT platforms for streaming obscene content.
agreed·hinduhindustan-times
?
The Ministry of Information and Broadcasting has blocked the platforms.
unverified·hindu
?
The blocked platforms are MoodXVIP, Koyal Playpro, Digi Movieplex, Feel, and Jugnu.
unverified·hindu
?
Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, grants the Centre power to block online content.
unverified·hindustan-times
Coverage gaps
The specific names of the five blocked OTT platforms.
Reportedhindu
Missinghindustan-times
The legal provision, Section 69A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, that grants the Centre power to block online content.